<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>EAP / bridging programs | Daniel Schmidtke</title><link>https://www.danschmidtke.com/tag/eap-/-bridging-programs/</link><atom:link href="https://www.danschmidtke.com/tag/eap-/-bridging-programs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>EAP / bridging programs</description><generator>Source Themes Academic (https://sourcethemes.com/academic/)</generator><language>en-us</language><item><title>Reading Gains that Stick: Greater Reading growth during EAP program, Higher GPAs Later</title><link>https://www.danschmidtke.com/currentprojects/gpa/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.danschmidtke.com/currentprojects/gpa/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="the-big-idea">The big idea&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>A lot of research shows that students improve during English bridging programs — but much less is known about whether those improvements &lt;em>pay off&lt;/em> once students are in their degree programs. We linked students’ &lt;strong>pre-university reading growth&lt;/strong> to their &lt;strong>GPAs up to four years later&lt;/strong>.&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="what-we-did">What we did&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Followed &lt;strong>405 English-as-an-additional-language (EAL)&lt;/strong> students through a &lt;strong>28-week&lt;/strong> university EAP program.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Measured reading and reading-related skills at the &lt;strong>start and end&lt;/strong> of the program (including &lt;strong>silent reading rate&lt;/strong>).&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Predicted later undergraduate &lt;strong>GPA&lt;/strong> using a mix of modern and traditional statistics:
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Random Forests&lt;/strong> to discover which variables mattered most&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Regression to quantify the size of the effect&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="what-we-found">What we found&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Among many predictors, &lt;strong>reading-rate growth&lt;/strong> during the program emerged as one of the &lt;strong>top predictors&lt;/strong> of future GPA (a rare case where a &lt;em>change score&lt;/em> is doing real work).&lt;/li>
&lt;li>The relationship was meaningful in practical terms: a &lt;strong>~26 WPM&lt;/strong> larger improvement in silent reading rate predicted about a &lt;strong>0.21 GPA&lt;/strong> increase.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>In plain language: &lt;strong>students who became more efficient readers before university tended to thrive more academically afterward.&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="why-it-matters">Why it matters&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Reading isn’t just “one skill among many” at university — it’s the gateway to lectures, slides, textbooks, assignments, and exams. Our results suggest that helping students &lt;strong>speed up comprehension-focused reading&lt;/strong> &lt;em>before&lt;/em> degree programs begin can have &lt;strong>long-lasting academic benefits&lt;/strong>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;br>&lt;br>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Reading experience drives L2 reading speed development</title><link>https://www.danschmidtke.com/currentprojects/readinghabits/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.danschmidtke.com/currentprojects/readinghabits/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="the-big-idea">The big idea&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Practice matters—but not all practice is equal. We tracked students’ real-world reading habits during a bridging program to test whether &lt;strong>reading more English texts&lt;/strong> gives learners an extra boost in &lt;strong>reading speed development&lt;/strong>, beyond the effect of instruction alone.&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="what-we-did">What we did&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Followed &lt;strong>142&lt;/strong> Mandarin/Cantonese-speaking English learners in an &lt;strong>8-month university bridging program&lt;/strong>.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Collected &lt;strong>week-by-week reading logs&lt;/strong> over &lt;strong>26 weeks of classroom instruction&lt;/strong>, where students recorded what they read, how long they read, and how many pages they covered.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Modeled change in reading speed over time, then tested whether &lt;strong>total pages read&lt;/strong> predicted &lt;strong>who improved the most&lt;/strong>.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="what-we-found">What we found&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Students became faster readers over time: minutes-per-page &lt;strong>decreased steadily across the program&lt;/strong> (a clear linear improvement).&lt;/li>
&lt;li>The key finding: &lt;strong>reading experience mattered&lt;/strong>. Students who read &lt;strong>more pages&lt;/strong> during the program tended to show &lt;strong>larger net gains&lt;/strong> in reading speed.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="why-it-matters">Why it matters&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>This gives a simple, practical lever for programs: instruction helps, but encouraging (and supporting) students to &lt;strong>read more in English&lt;/strong>—especially beyond required coursework—can meaningfully accelerate reading fluency growth.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;br>&lt;br>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>